Clients With Osteoporosis Questionnaire Health And Social Care Essay

digest of informations is a procedure of inspecting, cleansing, transforming, and patterning informations with the end of foregrounding utile information, proposing decisions, and back uping finale devising.This chapter deals with the analysis and reading of informations collected from 30 samples on invitees with Osteoporosis at Melmaruvathur Adhiparasakthi demonstrate of medical Science and Research. This survey was make with questionnaire, incorporate military range gradatory table and experimental checklist. entropy analysis was done by utilizing descriptive and illative statistical process. The points were orderd after idea and rating and the consequences were tabulated. The statistical methods use for analysis were aver hop on, received leaving, gestural exam and correlativity.Description OF THE TOOLSDetailss of the tools in this survey be as follows PART- IDemographic variablesDemographic variables include mount, gender, educational get, business, star sign mont hly income, matrimonial position, faith, household history of co- diseased disease, diet and bad wonts.PART- IIStructured Rating ScaleStructured evaluation receive table of Index of rigor of Osteoporosis by Lequesne appraisal tool was utilise to place the improvement in the wellness position of clients with Osteoporosis.PART- IIIIt includes Experimental Checklist of nursing intercessions for client with Osteoporosis.REPORT OF THE PILOT STUDYThe pilot survey was conducted on July of 2010 to pass give away the effectivity of nursing attending on clients with Osteoporosis in Melmaruvathur Adhiparasakthi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Melmaruvathur, Kanchipuram District for a halt of two hebdomads. A Index of Severity of Osteoporosis by Lequesne and was used by the research worker and used to happen out the dependability, asperity which was evaluated by the experts of the research commission. A convenient sampling technique was used to choose three samples by agencies of structured evaluation graduated table to measure the wellness position of clients with Osteoporosis. The nursing tutelage was provided as per the tool and wellness position was evaluated, eventually the research was analysed establish on the grade. thitherfore the nursing worry was extremely effectual on clients with Osteoporosis.CogencyThe tool was prep ared by the research worker under the proponent of experts and on the footing of aims, which were assessed and evaluated, accepted by the experts of research commission. Content cogency of this instrument was obtained from nursing experts.DependabilityThe dependability was checked by an interater method. The dependability was 0.80 by utilizing Cronbach & A acirc s expression. After the nursing financial aid was provided, gestural tribulation was used and found that nursing intercessions was effectual.INFORMED CONSENTThe research worker obtained written swallow from the Managing Director, Melmaruvathur Adhiparasa kthi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research and from the Principal of Adhiparasakthi College of Nursing, Melmaruvathur. Oral consent was taken from the survey participant to carry on the survey. The information aggregation was done for sixer hebdomads by utilizing interview and experimental method.DATA COLLECTION PROCEDUREThe informations were collected from the Osteoporosis clients who were admitted in Melmaruvathur Adhiparasakthi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research in Orthopaedic ward for the six hebdomads of survey period. A good resonance was maintained with the clients in format to derive the co- operation of the clients throughout the survey. After roll uping demographic informations, appraisal was done with the aid of amountised evaluation graduated table. The nursing attention was given utilizing a experimental checklist. On the twenty-four hours of discharge the client & A acirc s wellness position was evaluated with the aid of same structured evaluation gr aduated table.SCORE INTERPRETATIONThe mark was interpretated as follows Mark reading = Obtained score ten 100Entire markSCORE DESCRIPTIONDescriptionPercentageHealthyMild wellness impairment reclaim wellness impairmentSevere wellness impairmentLess than 25 %25- 50 %50- 75 %More than 75 %STATISTICAL METHODS.No.DATA ANALYSISMethodRemark1Descriptive statistics absolute frequency per centum, Mean, Standard divergenceTo depict the demographic variables.2Inferential statistics1.Sign trial2.CorrelationAnalyzing the effectivity between pre appraisal and station rating of wellness position of the clients with Osteoporosis.Correlation between selected demographic variables and rating of wellness position of clients with Osteoporosis.Data analysis and reading were done under following headers.Section- A statistical distribution of selected demographic variables of clients with Osteoporosis.Section- B frequency and per centum distribution of wellness position of clients with Osteoporosis.Section - C Comparison of mean and standard divergence of appraisal and rating mark of effectivity of nursing attention on clients with Osteoporosis.Section- D Mean and standard divergence of procession mark for clients with OsteoporosisSECTION- Tocopherol Correlation between selected demographic variables and effectivity of nursing attention on clients with Osteoporosis.SECTION- A Table 4.1 dissemination of selected demographic variables of clients with OsteoporosisN= 30S.No.DEMOGRAPHIC VARIABLESFrequencyPercentage1Age ( In old ages )18- 3233- 4546- 58& A gt 5807167023.353.323.32GenderMaleFemale52516.783.33Education experimental conditionIlliterate radical schoolHigher substitute(prenominal)Graduate/ College1210444033.313.313.34OccupationEmployedUn utilizeRetiredformer(a)s1767056.720.023.305Family & A acirc s monthly Income ( in Rs. )Up to 20002001- 40004001- 6000Above 60017116623.336.720206Marital StatusMarriedUnmarriedWidow/ widowerDivorced210907003007Religion HindiChristian Mosl emOthers10515033.316.750.008 annals of any co- morbid diseaseOsteoporosisOther Orthopaedic ProblemsNone both(prenominal)1559150.016.730.03.39DietVegetarianNon- Vegetarian1515505010Bad Ha trashs alcohol fastballBothNone32421106.713.370Table 4.1 implies the distribution of respondents harmonizing to certain demographic factors such as age, gender, educational position, business, household monthly income, matrimonial position, faith, household history of deoxycytidine monophosphate monoxide morbid disease, diet and bad wonts.Out of 30 clients 7 ( 23.3 per centum ) clients were in the age assemblage 33- 45 old ages, 16 ( 53.3 per centum ) clients were in the age group of 46- 58 old ages, 7 ( 23.3 per centum ) clients were in the age group of to a higher place 58 old ages. close of the clients, 16 ( 53.3 per centum ) were in the age group of 46- 58 old ages.Sing gender 5 ( 16.7 per centum ) of clients are male and 25 ( 83.3 per centum ) of clients are female. mass of clients, 25 ( 83.3 per centum ) were females.Out of 30 clients 12 ( 40 per centum ) clients are illiterate, 10 ( 33.3 per centum ) clients completed primary school, 4 ( 13.3 per centum ) clients completed high school, and 4 ( 13.3 per centum ) clients are graduate / college. Most of the clients, 12 ( 40 per centum ) are illiterate.Sing business 17 ( 56.7 per centum ) of clients are employed and 6 ( 20 per centum ) of clients are unemployed and 7 ( 23.3 per centum ) are retired. legal age of clients, 17 ( 56.7 per centum ) are illiterate.In instance of household monthly income up to Rs. 2000/- was drawn by 7 ( 23.3 per centum ) clients, 11 ( 36.7 per centum ) had monthly income of Rs. 2001/- to Rs. 4000/- , 6 ( 20 per centum ) were in the income group of Rs. 4001/- to Rs. 6000/- and 6 ( 20 per centum ) clients had a monthly income of above Rs. 6000/- . Most of the clients, 11 ( 36.7 per centum ) had monthly income of Rs. 2001/- to Rs. 4000/-While analyzing the matrimonial position of clients 21 ( 70 per centum ) are married and 9 ( 30 per centum ) were widower/ widow. Most of the clients 21 ( 70 per centum ) are married.10 ( 33.3 per centum ) of clients are Hindu were as 5 ( 16.7 per centum ) of clients are Christian and 15 ( 50 per centum ) are Muslim. Majority 15 ( 50 per centum ) of clients are Muslim.Out of 30 clients 15 ( 50 per centum ) clients are with co- household history of Osteoporosis, 5 ( 16.7 per centum ) clients are with household history of other orthopedic jobs, 9 ( 30 per centum ) clients are with no co- morbid disease and 1 ( 3.3 per centum ) is with both household history of Osteoporosis every bit good as other orthopedic jobs, Most of the clients, 15 ( 50 per centum ) clients are with household history of Osteoporosis.Sing diet 15 ( 50 per centum ) of clients are vegetarian and 15 ( 50 per centum ) of clients are non- vegetarian.While analyzing the bad wonts 3 ( 10 per centum ) of clients are holding the wont of devouring intoxicant and 2 ( 6.7 per cent um ) are of clients with the wont of smoke, 4 ( 13.3 per centum ) are with both the wonts. 21 ( 70 per centum ) of clients do non hold any bad wonts. Majority of clients, 12 ( 70 per centum ) do non hold any bad wonts.SECTION- B Table 4.2 Frequency and per centum distribution of wellness position of clients with OsteoporosisN= 30.S.NoHealth STATUSAppraisalEvaluationNumberPercentageNumberPercentage1Healthy00516.72Mild wellness impairment62024703Moderate wellness impairment2273.313.34Severe wellness impairment26.700Table 4.2 shows that at the metre of immediate station operative period wellness position of clients were assessed, out of 30 clients 2 ( 6.7 per centum ) were in irritating wellness impairment, 22 ( 73.3 per centum ) were in moderate wellness impairment and 6 ( 20 per centum ) are in mild wellness impairment. At the clip of discharge the wellness position of clients were evaluated, out of 30 clients 5 ( 16.7 ) were healthy, 24 ( 70 per centum ) are in mild wellness impair ment, merely 1 ( 3.3 per centum ) are in moderate wellness impairment and 5 ( 16.7 per centum ) were healthy.Section- C Table 4.3 Comparison of mean and standard divergence of appraisal and rating mark of clients with OsteoporosisN= 30.S.No.Health STATUSMeanStandardDeviationCONFIDENCE INTERVAL1Appraisal30.83.0631.28- 28.22Evaluation16.963.9417.96- 14.44Table 4.3 indicates assessment bonnie cling to 30.8 with standard divergence of 3.06 and rating mean value 16.96 with standard divergence of 3.94.SECTION- D Table 4.4 Mean and standard divergence of betterment mark for clients with OsteoporosisN= 30.S.No.Health STATUSMeanStandard DEVIATIONSecondValueKValue1Improvement mark13.833.6425.38**p & A lt 0.05 head of significanceTable 4.4 shows that betterment score average with 13.83 and standard divergence of 3.64. The K value is 2 and S value is 5.38. Since the deliberate value is greater than table value, it implies that there was statistically extremely consequential betterment in wellness position of clients with Osteoporosis after the post- operative nursing attention at 0.05 degree of significance. Thus the nursing attention on clients with Osteoporosis was effectual.Section- E Table 4.5 Correlation between the selected demographic variables with the effectivity of nursing attention of clients with Osteoporosis.S.No.DEMOGRAPHIC VARIABLESAppraisalEvaluationRSevere wellness impairmentModerate wellness impairmentModerate wellness impairmentMild wellness impairmentNo.%No%No%No%1Age ( In old ages )18- 3233- 4546- 58& A gt 58010103.303.3061060203.320010003.3000616702053.323.3-0.32GenderMaleFemale0206.73191063.30103.352416.780-0.83Education StatusIlliteratePrimary schoolHigher SecondaryGraduate/ College10013.3003.39643302013.31000010003.31210434033.313.3100.4*4OccupationEmployedUn- employedRetiredOthers420013.36.700124604013.320010003.30001667053.32023.30-0.15Family & A acirc s monthly Income ( in Rs. )Up to 20002001- 40004001- 60006001- 8000010103.303.358451 6.726.713.316.700010003.37116523.336.72016.70.36Marital StatusMarriedUnmarriedWidow/ WidowerDivorced10103.303.301606053.3020010003.30002009066.70300-0.17ReligionHindooChristianMoslemOthers11003.33.30063130201043.3010003.3000951503016.7500-0.28Family history of any co- morbid diseaseOsteoporosisOther orthopedic jobsNoneBoth20006.70001057033.316.723.30010003.3001459146.716.7303.3-0.29DietVegetarianNon- vegetarian113.33.3111136.736.7141546.750103.30-0.210Bad wontsAlcoholSmokingBothNone010103.303.3111193.33.33.363.30001000132420306.713.316.70.1**p & A lt 0.05 degree of significanceTable 4.5 indicates that there was statistically no important correlativity between selected demographic variables like age, gender, business, household monthly income, matrimonial position and faith, household history of co- morbid disease, diet and bad wonts. There is important correlativity in educational position.