Monday, January 28, 2019
Letter from Birmingham Jail Essay
The Letter from Birmingham Jail written by Martin Luther fag is striving to soundify the regard for an action that is orchestrate and nonviolent. It also talks rough the Black bulk and their possibility to recreate to disorder and civil disobedience and magnates own frustrations with church building whom he thought as non doing the duties and responsibilities that people of God should do. Martin Luther fag does non want violence to ensue. He just wants to implement or make amendments to the existing equitys of the country and the ruling of the Supreme Court in 1954 to be observed.According to King, an individual has the moral responsibility to not succeed or observe rightfulnesss that are unjust (King 1963). The mass action does not break the law beca use a law that is not chastely remunerate is not really a law. The laws are made to protect the citizens of the grunge and not to be used for punishment and degradation of the people. The pitch-black people of Americ a were willing to do what it takes to claim their legal and moral rights that are rightfully theirs. They will do this preferably without violence and through amicable means.If they are not allowed to express their sen cartridge clipnts, consequently they would resort to a more uglier scenario. If these needs of the black Ameri set ups will not be addressed soon, thither will be chaos and violence since the people have so many emotions and frustrations that are pent up inside. A similar write up of civil disobedience nooky be found in precedent readings. One such reading is Chief Seattles Oration wherein he talked about the relationship of the people and mother earth. It talks about the primaeval Americans as a minority range and the violence that has occurred between his race and that of the white people.He elevates his people in that oration by construction that the Euro-Americans were also to be blamed for the violence because he recalled a time when the white man drove their forefathers further into the west. The Native Americans want intermission to reign in the land. The same with the Letter from Birmingham Jail, Oration talks about resorting to violence if the rights of the people will not be respected and the law wold choose to persecute them instead. They would rather have peace but it is the persecution of the law that forces them to resort to violence.The law that is observed by the whites is said to be morally unjust because it discriminates against minorities instead of protecting them. This justification of moral action that is seeming(a) in the two previous works mentioned is also evident in Platos Crito. This is a dialogue that will justify the decision of Socrates to retain in prison despite the fact that he was wrongfully impeach of doing something that he did not do. Plato made a distinction between the just laws in which Socrates obeyed by staying in prison and the morally wrong demeanour of those who accused him.As can be see n from the previous readings, the laws that man has created can be morally unjust for those who are disadvantaged like the black Americans and the native Americans or Indians. Every man has the right to defend himself when he no longer sees the rules to be morally just. Just like King said in his letter, rules were made for the protection of all and not for the inner(a) few. If people cannot fight for their rights as human existences and are being persecuted, then they have no choice but to defend themselves through the use of violence.The only difference that can be seen from Birmingham Jail is that Socrates opted to stay in prison and not fight against the authorities. He did not feel the need to resort to violence because he was following the just law of not escaping in prison. Kings cerebrate for the civil disobedience is being written in letter through a type of reasoning that is inductive. If the government will not respect the rights of the black Americans and not learn t o them even through protests of peaceful means, then violence will be used against them. There are universal rights that all people can appeal to.These are the basic rights of man to live, freedom of speech and grimace and many others. There are certain rights that are dictated by the state and culture to protect certain aspects of society. But these laws should not kick downstairs the rights of the people. The laws will become morally unjust if the rights of the people will be stepped on or become endangered. It is true that rights and laws can be in conflict. Thats why there is a need for the world, especially the governments of countries, to find out to the people regarding changes in the law just like the letter of Martin Luther King Jr.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.